Adam Johnson, director of Leeds-based Tudor International Freight, said the draft withdrawal agreement and political declaration agreed by Prime Minister Theresa May and the EU Commission seemed almost certain to be rejected by the House of Commons next week. Equally, it appeared there was no majority in Parliament for the UK leaving the bloc without a deal next March, the default option under the Article 50 withdrawal process.
Mr Johnson said one potential route out of this impasse, which seemed to have gained support among MPs in recent days, was the country operating alongside Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein by re-joining the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) and becoming a European Economic Area (EEA) member.
He said this arrangement could apply following the UK’s envisaged post-EU transition period ending in December 2020, perhaps until it finished negotiating a Canada-style free trade agreement with the bloc, which was likely to take several years.
Mr Johnson said: “For the UK overall, as government analyses published last week made clear and Chancellor Philip Hammond has acknowledged, no plausible form of Brexit is likely to deliver future economic benefits equalling those we’d derive as a full EU member.
“Although those analyses excluded the deal Mrs May has agreed, they did forecast the ‘Norway’ option would be the least damaging main alternative, resulting in UK GDP being 1.4% per person lower in 15 years’ time than it would be if we stayed in the EU. This compares with reductions per head of up to 2.7% with the Prime Minister’s now-abandoned Chequers proposals and 8.1% if we leave the bloc without a deal.”
Mr Johnson said the main reason for the EEA option causing the least economic damage was that it would keep the UK in the EU’s Single Market, a position that would also benefit the oil and gas industry’s EU traders.
He explained: “The Single Market covers all EU member states, plus four other countries, and involves the free movement of goods, services, labour and capital. Nations in the Single Market observe common rules and regulations, making it easy for their companies to trade with each other across borders.
“The second word in ‘Norway Plus’ refers to the UK adding the effective continuation of its Customs Union membership - already agreed in principle by the EU, as it’s part of the existing draft withdrawal agreement - to EEA membership. The Customs Union, embracing all EU states and some other countries, involves members waiving taxes on goods traded between them and applying a common tariff to items entering their territories from external nations.”
Mr Johnson said the combined effect of retained Single Market and Customs Union membership would be goods continuing to be shipped between the UK and EU without costly tariffs being imposed or burdensome and time-consuming customs and regulatory checks taking place.
He said: “Such arrangements are easy, quick and cheap for the oil and gas industry’s EU traders and the freight forwarders, like us, that they employ. It seems the only practical alternative way of retaining these almost-ideal arrangements now would be Brexit not happening at all, through a vote in Parliament or – more likely – a further referendum, for example.”
Mr Johnson said the EEA option, in addition to providing much-needed certainty for the oil and gas sector’s EU traders, would preserve the open border in Ireland, which was vital for maintaining trade and other reasons.
He said: “Perhaps the most crucial piece of evidence in favour of the EEA is that, almost 25 years after joining it, Norway is prosperous and competitive. Polls among its people show strong support for retaining EEA membership and typically only about 20% of those questioned want to join the EU.”
Read the article online at: https://www.oilfieldtechnology.com/special-reports/06122018/oil-and-gas-sector-logistics-expert-says-norway-plus-is-least-damaging-form-of-brexit-for-industrys-eu-traders/